2023 Mazda CX-60 Long-Term Review: Living With Mazda’s New Premium Euro SUV

Mazda has decided to play ball in the big leagues by introducing an all-new line of SUVs to challenge the Germans’ reign of the premium market. The CX-60, now the biggest Mazda in the UK (at least until the CX-80 arrives later this year), is poised to compete with a wide range of models – from the swanky Audi Q5 and BMW X3 to the ever-popular Toyota RAV4.

What’s Under The Hood?

The Mazda CX-60 is closely related to the seven-seat CX-90 recently launched in the U.S., both using a new longitudinal-engine platform and being offered with four-cylinder PHEV or six-cylinder ICE power.

Review: Mazda CX-60’s Hybrid Drivetrain Spoils Premium SUV Newcomer

We’ve got the PHEV, which is unusual because it’s a not a turbo’d 2.0 but a naturally-aspirated 2.5. It’s assisted by a electric motor stashed inside the eight-speed automatic transmission that is rated at 129 kW (173 hp / 175 PS) and helps make a combined 323 hp (327 PS) and 369 lb-ft (500 Nm) of torque. That enables the CX-60 to hit 62 mph (100 kmh) in 5.8 seconds, while Mazda says the 17.8 kWh battery is good for 39 miles (63 km) of electric driving.

What Options Are Fitted?

The mid-spec Homura comes standard with 20-in wheels, heat for all four seats and cooling for the fronts, LED lights, a powered tailgate, keyless entry and head-up display.

Our car goes a step further with Machine Grey paint (£750), the Convenience Pack (£1000, 360-degree camera, wireless phone charging, privacy glass), Driver Assistance Pack (£1100, cross traffic alert, adaptive cruise, adaptive LED lights) and £1000 of panoramic sunroof.

Report 1

I’ve been running this car in the UK for Car Magazine’s long-termer section for the past six months and 11,000 or so miles (17,702 km), which is plenty of time to generate some firm electric range and economy numbers. But of course, being a PHEV, those numbers can vary dramatically depending on where you drive it and whether you remember (or bother) to charge it, which takes 7h 50 from flat using a regular 240-volt UK household socket.

I’ve never matched Mazda’s quoted 39-mile (63 km) electric range, but I have seen 32 (52 km) a few times. Most days, though, the battery seems to be toast in 25 miles (40 km). That’s enough for me to run errands close to the house like dropping kids at school, and means many days the 2.5 ICE motor doesn’t get out of bed, but it doesn’t make much of an impact on a four-hour motorway blast.

On those kinds of long, high-speed drives with the 17.8 kWh of battery energy a distant memory, the economy tends to be around 26-28 mpg (31-33 mpg UK), but a more normal mix of short and long journeys over the course of a month can get the numbers up towards 31-32 mpg (37-38 mpg UK).

One annoying detail is the fluctuation in the overall petrol/electric driving range and also the fuel level. Just check out the two images above to see what I’m talking about. In the top pic the car shows no usable battery charge, so no electric range, but thinks I can only do 140 miles (225 km) on more than three quarters of a tank of fuel (a full tank is 45 liters or 11.9 gal U.S.). In the lower pic, it claims 20 miles (32 km) of electric range and half a tank of fuel, but estimates the combined petrol-electric range as 160 miles (258 km).

Obviously the range calculations are affected by how you’ve been driving the car, but both of these pictures were snapped in similar situations. We haven’t yet driven the North American CX-90 that uses this same platform and drivetrain, but we imagine it also suffers from the same indecision. Let us know if you’ve driven a CX-90 and can tell us if that’s true.

Photos Chris Chilton / Carscoops